Holland
Author - PhilBackground - Five Ruths, a plea for the recyling of family names.
Coppenhall - what the Hollands were up to in the 17th and 18th century
Moving on from Coppenhall - Middlewich, Eaton and Congleton
Finally
Five Ruths, a plea for the recycling of family names.
Above are five generations connecting Lorna Ruth to Ruth Elizabeth Holland (the fourth Ruth) - there are four generations between the two Ruths. I have called Ruth Elizabeth the fourth Ruth based on her year of birth (1891) when she was the fourth known Holland to be called Ruth.
Below are five generations back from Ruth Elizabeth Holland to William Holland, and four generations again between these two Ruths (the fourth and the first).

On to the second Ruth born 1850 - the box chart below has Ruth Holland born 1795 (the first) in the centre at the bottom:
This chart is a little more confusing. Ruth (the first) gave birth to a son who was Illegitimate, she called him John (he is Ruth Elizabeth's and Lorna Ruth's direct ancestor and is not shown on this diagram) Ruth then married Ralph Stubbs. One of the five children that Ruth and Ralph had was called Jane Stubbs. Jane married her cousin another John Holland . John and Jane had a daughter that they called Ruth born 1850 (the second Ruth).
That leaves the final Ruth born 1856 (the third Ruth).John Holland was born in Stapley in 1817 and his christening of the 8th June 1817 from St Chads Wybunbury Cheshire states: John illegitimate son of Ruth Holland Stapeley. John married Sarah Whittaker in 1845 and named his first daughter born in 1856 Ruth. The third Ruth.
So one final diagram to show all the Ruth's together. Note that all siblings are hidden (scores of them!)
John and Sarah already had four sons when Ruth was born including James (1851) my direct ancestor. John had three more children two with Sarah and one with his second wife Hannah Ackerley.
Return to top of page
Coppenhall - what the Hollands were up to in the 17th and 18th century
For many years the earliest record I had for the Holland branch of the family was a christening record of 8th June 1817 from St Chads Wybunbury Cheshire it states: John illegitimate son of Ruth Holland Stapeley". The same records were checked from 1813 to 1830 there are no other Hollands in the records. It was common at this time to baptise illegitimate children in an adjoining parish. Ruth's family were from Coppenhall where Ruth was christened at St Michaels in 1795.

The tree above shows Ruth as the second child. We have details of children for five of the siblings John, Ruth, William, James and Thomas. Of the five that did not have children Peter is significant as he left a will, In this will which was proved in 1881 Peter mentions some surviving siblings and their children and also his former wife's illegitimate son:-
- ....legacies namely to my nephew Peter Sumner twenty pounds and the sum of twenty pounds each to the three children of my accused brother John Holland namely John Holland Thomas Holland and William Holland...
- ....a sum of two Hundred pounds I direct this to be invested and the interest thereof paid to Fanny Kay the widow of the late Samuel Kay who was an illegitimate child of my late wife's Mary Holland....
- ....pay the third share to my brother James Holland another third to my brother Thomas Holland and the remaining one third to my sister Mary Smith of Church Coppenhall aforesaid Widow....
Below is an old postcard view of St Chads Wybunbury
It appeared that Peter was a dominant family member appearing as a witness at many weddings, and he seems to have been an important Farmer in the area. Following Peter's death it looks at though the farm began to break up.
Of William and Betty's five boys two continued in farming - Peter and William, James became a publican and later a Mechanical Labourer (probably as a result of the railway arriving) and Thomas became a Blacksmith in nearby Tetton. John was a labourer when his son, also called John, married Jane Stubbs (his cousin) in 1849.
Return to top of page
Moving on from Coppenhall - Middlewich, Eaton and Congleton
John Holland (born 1829) the son of Ruth Holland was living in Newton (Middlewich) at the time of his first marriage to Sarah Whittaker on 12th October 1845. No father was given on his marriage certificate. However for his second marriage to Hannah Ackerley on 5th August 1866 John gives a fathers name - Joseph a Labourer. With his first wife John had eight children the fifth was James who is our direct ancestor. He had one daughter with his second wife. On the 1881 census Dwelling: St Anns Rd Census Place: Newton In Northwich, Cheshire, England
John HOLLAND M 67 M born Stapley, Cheshire, England Rel: Head Occ: Farm Labourer
Hannah HOLLAND M 57 F Middlewich, Cheshire, England Rel: Wife
Sarah A. HOLLAND 14 F Newton, Cheshire, England Rel: Daur Occ: Tin Box Maker Milk Factory
Charles BAKER U 22 M Newton, Cheshire, England Rel: Boarder Occ: Gardener
Hannah BAKER 23 F Newton, Cheshire, England Rel: Boarder Occ: Fustian Cutter
George Holland on the left - photograph taken in 1940.
On the right is Ruth Holland with Henry Walton.
It looks as though this photo was taken before the one above and could be 1930s, it is probably when they moved to Kingsley Road, need to check when that was.Back to top of page
Finally
So we are nearly up to the present.
From Congleton Chronicle 6 March 1970 the transcribed obituary of Ruth Elizabeth Holland
Mrs R.E. Walton
Mrs Walton leaves a widower, a son, a daughter, three grand children and two great grand children.
Those who met at the church inc Mrs S Fryer, Mr & Mrs C Campbell,
Bearers were Messrs D Walton R Walton P Walton (grandsons) and J Holland (nephew)
The photograph here is of the marriage of Tom Hollands daughter Margaret to a GI before traveling back to the United States with her new husband. The photograph was given to me by tom's daughter Glenice who married Reg Nadin. Glenice is next to the groom.
America has been mentioned previously and family members are now spread across the world. Although there are still some in South Cheshire others are spread across the world. I'm sure that Ruth the first would have been very happy to know that her little boy John would have so many descendants.